Respectfully, I don't understand this. They never needed Next.js for a static blog.
This is like writing a post about how I didn't need a Ferrari to commute to work and I saved money by taking the bus.
GRgraemep25分钟前
> Hugo is the best of the bunch, but in the end, setting it up is still a hassle.
Then chooses an approach that looks like a lot more work than setting up Hugo.
PApampas4小时前
My home is much easier to heat now I've moved from an aircraft hanger into a cottage.
OGogou7小时前
The vast majority of websites don't need Next.js or React. Those are only useful if you need dynamic and modular updates within the structure, or state management. We've defaulted to React because of the name recognition and simple intertia. It's not a good framework for websites in general.
4P4pkjai8小时前
I wrote not so basic CRUD application that uses HTML and vanilla javascript. I don't even minify the javascript. That website loads significantly faster than all the other websites I have made.
评论
5 条预览评论 · 正在加载完整讨论请先登录 h4cker 账号，然后连接 Hacker News 后发表评论。
Respectfully, I don't understand this. They never needed Next.js for a static blog. This is like writing a post about how I didn't need a Ferrari to commute to work and I saved money by taking the bus.
> Hugo is the best of the bunch, but in the end, setting it up is still a hassle. Then chooses an approach that looks like a lot more work than setting up Hugo.
My home is much easier to heat now I've moved from an aircraft hanger into a cottage.
The vast majority of websites don't need Next.js or React. Those are only useful if you need dynamic and modular updates within the structure, or state management. We've defaulted to React because of the name recognition and simple intertia. It's not a good framework for websites in general.
I wrote not so basic CRUD application that uses HTML and vanilla javascript. I don't even minify the javascript. That website loads significantly faster than all the other websites I have made.