It's almost a shame it includes the private key and doesn't bruteforce it in-band for every request.
评论
4 条预览评论 · 正在加载完整讨论
登录后才能使用评论功能
请先登录 h4cker 账号，然后连接 Hacker News 后发表评论。
CYcyphar4天前
I wonder if more CPU cycles would be spent in the transporting and other ancillary operations (hashing and signing) than would be spent if they "brute-forced" it. Crazy.
SUsubscribed4天前
OMG, that would be brutal
JUjudge20204天前
I would've at least appreciated once per session
LIliteralAardvark4天前
They have the supporting code for using a key, I'm assuming they don't have in band bruteforce since it doesn't usually make any sense at all
评论
4 条预览评论 · 正在加载完整讨论请先登录 h4cker 账号，然后连接 Hacker News 后发表评论。
I wonder if more CPU cycles would be spent in the transporting and other ancillary operations (hashing and signing) than would be spent if they "brute-forced" it. Crazy.
OMG, that would be brutal
I would've at least appreciated once per session
They have the supporting code for using a key, I'm assuming they don't have in band bruteforce since it doesn't usually make any sense at all