economist.com

AI agents lie, cheat and steal. That is putting off users

andsoitis · 161 points · 199 comments · 21 godzin temu · Open original

Comments

5 preview comments · loading full thread
mannanj20 godzin temu

https://archive.ph/02LHZ Non-paywall version

armchairhacker19 godzin temu

I’m put off by AI agents adhering to a different morality than me, particularly (ironically) copyright, and their data accessible by the AI company and government. Geohot is right, an LLM should be aligned to its user: https://geohot.github.io/blog/jekyll/update/2026/07/11/ai-20...

rossdavidh19 godzin temu

They don't lie, because they don't ever have an understanding of truth vs any other language that sounds good. They don't cheat, because they can for example tell you the complete rules of chess, but don't know how to play chess without breaking those rules. They can recite rules, but they don't know what they are. They don't steal, because they don't understand ownership. In other words, they aren't intelligent. They're just algorithms. The flaw is in thinking that they think.

raincole20 godzin temu

> One of this year’s AI buzzwords is “harness”—the system that surrounds an LLM to keep agents on the straight and narrow. It might just as well be barbed wire. Quite painful to read. It might be a useful introduction to AI for people who live under rocks for the past three years, but it's really weird that it's posted on HN.

stronglikedan20 godzin temu

It's just acting like a junior at an org with KPIs.