korindiehacker.bloffy.blog

Removing Next.js Got My Blog to 100 on Every Lighthouse Category

textlanes33 · 154 points · 91 comments · il y a 11 heures · Open original

Comments

5 preview comments · loading full thread
pigbearpigil y a 7 heures

Respectfully, I don't understand this. They never needed Next.js for a static blog. This is like writing a post about how I didn't need a Ferrari to commute to work and I saved money by taking the bus.

graemepil y a 24 minutes

> Hugo is the best of the bunch, but in the end, setting it up is still a hassle. Then chooses an approach that looks like a lot more work than setting up Hugo.

pampasil y a 4 heures

My home is much easier to heat now I've moved from an aircraft hanger into a cottage.

ogouil y a 7 heures

The vast majority of websites don't need Next.js or React. Those are only useful if you need dynamic and modular updates within the structure, or state management. We've defaulted to React because of the name recognition and simple intertia. It's not a good framework for websites in general.

4pkjaiil y a 8 heures

I wrote not so basic CRUD application that uses HTML and vanilla javascript. I don't even minify the javascript. That website loads significantly faster than all the other websites I have made.