Log in to h4cker, then connect Hacker News to publish comments.
CJCJeffersonil y a 8 heures
Wow, that might be the worst name for a project I’ve ever seen. I think every programmer who sees this is going to assume it’s a Python thing.
With regards the library itself —- I think it’s generally known the c++ standard library is a poorly designed mess in places but if you make an entirely new one you lose all the software already written, at which point why use C++ nowadays?
PJpjmlpil y a 6 heures
> C++ is actually very fast to compile, the slowdowns come mostly from the way the standard library is implemented.
Only if using classical headers, std as module is already a reality on VC++.
JDJdeBPil y a 5 heures
Given what is discussed in the commentary to the post, I wonder whether the author would be amenable to some Doxygen.
SQsquirrellousil y a 6 heures
Love to see someone implementing pathlib in c++. It is what stdfs could have been.
ASAsookail y a 4 heures
Would be helpful to show how this compares to other C++ std replacements, e.g. Abseil and Folly.
Comments
5 preview comments · loading full threadLog in to h4cker, then connect Hacker News to publish comments.
Wow, that might be the worst name for a project I’ve ever seen. I think every programmer who sees this is going to assume it’s a Python thing. With regards the library itself —- I think it’s generally known the c++ standard library is a poorly designed mess in places but if you make an entirely new one you lose all the software already written, at which point why use C++ nowadays?
> C++ is actually very fast to compile, the slowdowns come mostly from the way the standard library is implemented. Only if using classical headers, std as module is already a reality on VC++.
Given what is discussed in the commentary to the post, I wonder whether the author would be amenable to some Doxygen.
Love to see someone implementing pathlib in c++. It is what stdfs could have been.
Would be helpful to show how this compares to other C++ std replacements, e.g. Abseil and Folly.